International I Hate Sports Club

Nick wrote:There was no pornography in that link...

Is flaming only against the rules if Fat Man doesn't like you or if you play sports? You complain about 4chan posting here, but when Fat Man insults people repeatedly, it's a different story. I would apologise to Fat Man if he showed me any redeeming qualities that would make apologising worth it.

And I don't think it's too pathetic to fight back against a (much) larger and older man who is insulting me, a 14 year old boy and who is talking about fapping. It's actually quite courageous.

Again you're a lying scum.

I went to that web site link you posted before it got deleted and it was another page on Encyclopedia Dramatica which made snide comments about teenage girls with all kinds of sexual innuendo.

Nick wrote:Oh, okay... so I forgot something from a webpage I read weeks ago, hooooly shit. But still, talking about me jacking off doesn't make you look any better.

When ever anybody posts nothing but nonsense or bullshit I say they're masturbating with a keyboard.

Also, I never liked you from the start because you said that all victims of bullying are jerks who deserve it, and you sympathize with the zoo-tramps from 4chan who came in here to harass us.

So, you have been a total jerk from the very start.

I knew right away that you are just a punk kid.

Now it's getting late, and way past your bedtime and your diaper change.

Wow, you lying little scum.

I said that in my experience the kids who get verbally bullied are jerks.

I knew you were just a punk behind his computer with something to prove.

I do love Fat Man. In fact, I doubt half of what he says is true. I respect him, as he is truly a God-tier Master Troll, albeit perhaps of the sleeper variety... also, you do know that when 4chan is described as all-knowing and all-powerful by people, they're not being serious, right?

Anyways, I love the little squabbles Fact Man tries to have to keep this board lively, I respect that; he is, after all, a troll. A very subtle troll, but still a troll. And I only use the 14 excuse when people are getting too heated up over what I say. It's the internet, bro. Light up a bowl and chill out.

You're not impressed that Polite24 wasn't banned.

You're not impressed that SportsGuy92 wasn't banned.

You're not impressed that Andy wasn't banned.

You're not impressed that SPORTS ROCK wasn't banned, even though he was insulting.

Not to mention others ...

But you're upset that the 4chan trolls were banned. So, you say that we're intolerant. Don't you realize that any objective reader can see that you're inconsistent? And the reason why you're inconsistent is because this is nothing more than a game to you.

No, I said that you ban them and then complain that they are enemies of your right to free speech, which is ironic because you are denying them the ability to speak.

Also, I wouldn't mind the Gay jersey if you want to give it to me. It'd give me some more credibility

If I didn't know you better, I'd say that you just don't get it. The intent of the 4chan raid in the middle of the night was to overload the forum with spam and hopefully hurt the website somehow. The purpose was to harass us from the very beginning. The few who registered but did not spam initially were plants who misrepresented themselves. You know perfectly well that if they had expressed criticisms of the website in their posts instead of spamming, they would have been tolerated. Again, all that the objective reader has to do is check the opening topics that were started by SportsGuy92 and Andy, not to mention others. Even those who started off being abusive were not banned. So, this proves that you are a hypocrit and a liar.

Freedom of speech does not mean that you have the right to break into my home and shout at me and smash my house down. That's why they call it "raiding" a website and not "debating" a website. Again, the honest person can see the difference.

Earl wrote:You're not impressed that Polite24 wasn't banned.

You're not impressed that SportsGuy92 wasn't banned.

You're not impressed that Andy wasn't banned.

You're not impressed that SPORTS ROCK wasn't banned, even though he was insulting.

Not to mention others ...

But you're upset that the 4chan trolls were banned. So, you say that we're intolerant. Don't you realize that any objective reader can see that you're inconsistent? And the reason why you're inconsistent is because this is nothing more than a game to you.

You don't have to explain yourself to this immature and inconsiderate pest. You have been more than fair. Banning him is justified.

Nick wrote:I do love Fat Man.

Are you trying to come on to me?

Now I feel sick!

I think I need to up-chuck!

Nick wrote:You'd like to see a 14 year old child masturbate, wouldn't you? The ED article said you were a pedophile... I guess GirlVinyl was right. (Even though she isn't the one who wrote your article, and you seem to assume that ED is all written by one person, Fat Man)

Are you kidding me? You're calling Fat Man a pedophile? Fat Man has brought up several times that he believes pedophiles are scum and that it is pathetic that there are pedophiles who aren't punished severely enough. Never mind the fact that what you accused Fat Man of being is completely wrong, but as Earl mentioned, he was raped by an older man in a mental institution. That's pathetic that you would say something like that to a victim of rape. I don't know what to say.

Nick wrote:No, I said that you ban them and then complain that they are enemies of your right to free speech, which is ironic because you are denying them the ability to speak.

Also, I wouldn't mind the Gay jersey if you want to give it to me. It'd give me some more credibility

I don't think anyone has been banned on here for the sole reason they like sports and wish to find out why we feel the way we do. The sort of people who do get banned are those who are unnecessarily abusive and pose a threat to the website and its members (e.g. Samdaman), spammers who post up pornographic links or any other worthless crap that we don't need to know about, or the 4chan spammers who just want to clog up the board with pointless crap and stupid pictures, or false personas like Hank and Yo_Joe (aka Samdaman) who pretend to side with us in a hope of gaining information that could allow them to bring down the whole forum or harass members in other ways. Honest and civil opponents are appreciated on here. At least by some members.

You want the gay jersey? I was thinking the SPAMMER rank (without a ban, though) would suit you more. But it really isn't down to me, is it? It's down to the moderators who decide what happens with the members.

Best regards,
i_like_1981

HugeFanOfBadReligion wrote:

Nick wrote:You'd like to see a 14 year old child masturbate, wouldn't you? The ED article said you were a pedophile... I guess GirlVinyl was right. (Even though she isn't the one who wrote your article, and you seem to assume that ED is all written by one person, Fat Man)

Are you kidding me? You're calling Fat Man a pedophile? Fat Man has brought up several times that he believes pedophiles are scum and that it is pathetic that there are pedophiles who aren't punished severely enough. Never mind the fact that what you accused Fat Man of being is completely wrong, but as Earl mentioned, he was raped by an older man in a mental institution. That's pathetic that you would say something like that to a victim of rape. I don't know what to say.

Well, so far Nick has received two warnings.

One more and he gets booted out of here. I believe that's the policy on most forums.

Yes, I say pedophiles are the scum of the earth and they should get the death penalty.



I also believe in the death penalty for rape.



And in every household with children, the parents should keep one of these handy spray cans.



This one is an UZI, made in Israel. It's Kosher!