SportsGuy92 wrote:Don't say football is for retards, you need to have some intelligence, and not just if you're a coach; as a player you need to know all of your team's plays and if one person fails to execute, the whole team suffers.
Millhouse wrote:Yes, yes, the typical argument that Polite24 has, unsuccessfully, attempted to throw at us. Football requires concentration. Football requires skill. Football requires fast thinking. What's not clicking with you and other sports fans like you is that as people who do not enjoy sports,
we simply do not care one way or the other how difficult it is. I certainly don't. I can think of a thousand physically demanding real world jobs that require physical and mental skill that are not connected to popular sports, that I can appreciate a lot more. The fact that something is popular does not make it exciting for everyone.
I know that you understand that football requires fast thinking, as well as most other people. It was just Fat Man's statement about it that pissed me off.
SportsGuy92 wrote:
I just don't want a select few bad athletes or sports fans to be representative of all who like sports.
Millhouse wrote:'Select few'. This is the very crux and nature of the problem with a Sports Fan's perception of how the real world works. Were you perhaps raised in a nicer school district and neighborhood like Polite24? I don't know where you're getting this idea that harrassing sports bullies and obnoxious sports fans represent some unmentionable vocal minority, and try to give the perception that many of these people aren't easily findable, because they hide in some magical 'cracks' in the wall, because they do not. The entire reason why we are annoyed by them is not due to one or two seriously traumatic incidents in life, the reason is because they are there, in every facet of life, transmitting their obnoxious behavior at the spiritual decibel level of a jet airliner. You can't refute this logic, Polite24 has already tried. Sports are popular, therefore it makes sense that sports fans would likely be (and are) everywhere.
1. I go to a private, Catholic school that puts up bullying a lot less than your typical public school, and therefore occurs less often. A physical assault that was unprovoked (think Hoffschneider in the Columbine story) would lead to a suspension at the bare minimum. The adminsistration has zero tolerance for any of that type of BS.
2. It's not just sports fans that take their hobby too seriously.
SportsGuy92 wrote:Sports can be mentally stimulating and challenging too
Millhouse wrote:Try again. I already knew this, and so does the rest of the board. I am into physical fitness, and there are many activities that I find more challenging than sports. That isn't the problem.
You may know this, but greencom denied it.
SportsGuy92 wrote:The "boorish behavior of sports fans" has nothing to do with the fact that they like sports
Millhouse wrote:No, their personality types tend to gravitate them toward sports, though, that can be proven. Still, "it has nothing to do with the fact that they like sports" doesn't matter at all. Because it does not excuse their poor behaviour towards both each other and the non sports fan.
Competitive people will always be gravitated toward sports, it's just that there are some people who take it too far, as with any other hobby you can think of.
SportsGuy92 wrote:"I don't know exactly who it was, but the next time you see them you need to apologize for it."
Millhouse wrote:Okay, and? Did the jocks apologise? I'm betting they blew snot rockets at their coach, or laughed it off and either continued the behaviour, or found something else to pick on them about.
I'm not sure they apologized, but they never did it again.
SportsGuy92 wrote:The athletes I know will often make a remark about someone like "that kid's a faggot", and I will tell them, "he's not so bad" or "I know him and he's actually a decent guy". Most of the time, it is someone who does like sports too, only they are not part of the jock clique or have other interests besides sports.
Millhouse wrote:So, which is it? The athletes making these remarks, or the sudden not-so-bad-not-part-of-the-jock-clique group of people you appear to invent in the second sentence? I'm betting my money on the athletes, and I am also betting money on the chances of your telling any of them "Hey he's not so bad" to be about as likely to influence them as flying elephants.
That's what I meant.