[RE-EDITED]
OK, I went to another web site at, yeah, FOX NEWS, but I'm not going to quote it here because it's word for word verbatim like the article in the previous forum post above.
But here is a picture of said device.
There's just one problem with the whole idea . . . . .
They found that the device works better on people who were reading aloud than engaged in 'spontaneous speech' and it cannot stop people making meaningless sounds, such as 'ahhh,' that are uttered over a long time period.
And therein lies the problem.
Most sports fans go DUUUUUUUHHH! HUUUUUH HUUUH HUUUUUH! I LUUUUUVVV FOOOOOOOTBAAAAAAALLL!
Their long slow utterances would not be stopped by the devise and can still get through.
But people having an intelligent conversation would be blocked by such a devise.
Yeah! Uh huh! Just what the world needs right now! A device that blocks coherent speech while only allowing the incoherent moronic DUUUUUUUHHH type of speech to get through!
Of course, the Republicans would love it if only the long slow utterances of drooling morons can get through, while intelligent speech is stopped.
The Republicans fear intelligent people who can see through their lies and call them out on their bullshit, but they just love moronic drooling sheep and cattle, like, BAAAAAAAHHH! BAAAAAAAHHH! MMMOOOOOOO! MMMOOOOOOO!
Yeah, it would be nice to make moronic sports fans shut up, but not at the expense of free speech for the rest of us who might have something more intelligent to say.
Sorry, but I can see how this devise can be miss-used.
I have a much better idea.
To all those who personally know some obnoxious sports fan . . . do something to make his death look like a stupid accident that could be featured on 1000 Ways To Die!
Most sports fans are idiots who can be easily set up to take a fall.
[RE-EDIT]
Yeah! I just though of another scenario where the devise can be abused.
Imagine, one of my favorite intellectuals, for example: Richard Dawkins, is about to give a lecture about science, like, astronomy, geology, paleontology, or EVOLUTION at some university.
Then, some moronic right-wing Christard Funny-mentalist manages to sneak the above mentioned device into the lecture hall, and points it at Richard Dawkin's, causing him to stutter.
OK, I have known people who stutter a lot when speaking, but have no problems at all while singing. Yeah, I have known people with beautiful singing voices, yet they stutter when trying to speak, but never stutter while singing.
So, I guess, prominent scientists who give lectures at universities will have to take singing lessons, so that they can sing their lectures instead of speaking.
Then, the device won't interfere what they're saying, or rather, singing.
I imaging, if Carl Sagan were still alive today, he would have a beautiful singing voice.
There's always a way to counteract something.
WOW! Talk about having to literally sing for your supper!