Page 3 of 3

Re: Yet another reason to avoid little league

Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 7:39 pm
by Earl
Yes, the ACLU does represent NAMBLA. In a recent case they defended NAMBLA from being sued by the parents of a young boy who had been raped and murdered by two pedophiles. Absolutely heartless! Years ago I watched an ACLU member on the Morton Downey Jr. Show say that child pornography is protected by the Constitution! The Founding Fathers of our country must be rolling in their graves now. The legalization of pornography -- which was spearheaded by the ACLU, of course -- helped to pave the way for this perversity. In a healthy society, anyone who even advocated pedophilia would be thrown in jail. But don't you see, Ray? "Freedom of speech" (unless it's politically incorrect) trumps everything. And, no, I'm not even a Republican or a politically ideological conservative. I'm just a poor slob who believes in moral standards. You know the old saying. A person's rights end where another person's rights begin.

Re: Yet another reason to avoid little league

Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:15 am
by Fat Man
Earl wrote:Yes, the ACLU does represent NAMBLA. In a recent case they defended NAMBLA from being sued by the parents of a young boy who had been raped and murdered by two pedophiles. Absolutely heartless! Years ago I watched an ACLU member on the Morton Downey Jr. Show say that child pornography is protected by the Constitution! The Founding Fathers of our country must be rolling in their graves now. The legalization of pornography -- which was spearheaded by the ACLU, of course -- helped to pave the way for this perversity. In a healthy society, anyone who even advocated pedophilia would be thrown in jail. But don't you see, Ray? "Freedom of speech" (unless it's politically incorrect) trumps everything. And, no, I'm not even a Republican or a politically ideological conservative. I'm just a poor slob who believes in moral standards. You know the old saying. A person's rights end where another person's rights begin.
Yes, this is absolutely horrible! This sucks on all four cylinders.

Now, I'm all for freedom of speech and I'm against censorship.

But when it comes to child pornography, or "kiddie porn" that is where I draw the line.

Adult pornography is protected by free speech, as it should be. I don't particularly care to look as explicit pornography, but otherwise I don't mind nude photos.

But that is adult pornography, and adults can choose whether or not to pose for nude photos. Adults are mature enough to make a choice in the matter.

On the other hand, little children are not mature enough to give consent, therefore kiddie porn is exploitation of children because they are always used against their will.

But pedophiles like to argue that kiddie porn is free speech, and they like to argue that kiddie porn should be protected as free speech.

While it may be "free speech" for the pedophiles , it's NOT freedom for children, because the production of kiddie porn involves the entrapment, exploitation, and the virtual slavery of children, so it's not freedom for children, but child slavery.

If a person enjoys something the involves entrapment, exploitation, and enslavement of another person, then it can not be protected as free speech.

Therefore, kiddie porn is NOT free speech!

Civil Liberties should be for everybody, white or black, Jew or Gentile, young or old, fat or thin, and adult or child, all are entitled to civil liberties.

But NOT pedophiles! They disregard the civil rights and civil liberties of children, by exploiting them and enslaving them.

That's why I don't understand how the ACLU, American Civil Liberties Union can possibly fight for pedophiles who enslave children.

Who fights for the rights of children?

Pedophiles are criminals who should be locked up, and put in a prison deep under ground where the can never see the sun ever again.

NAMBLA is a criminal Pedophiles Guild!

Hey! I just had an idea!

Since the ACLU is defending a Pedophiles Guild . . . . .

How about I start a Bank Robbers Guild!

Yeah! That's right! I want to start a Bank Robbers Guild!

Oh! And how about a Serial Killers Guide!!!

Hell! Way not???

As long as the ACLU believe that pedophiles have rights, then bank robbers and serial killers should also have the same rights.

And how about an Arsonists Guild?

Now, you all see where I'm going with this.

No, pedophiles should not have any rights. They should be locked away where they can do no further harm to children.

The only "rights" that should be granted to a pedophile is three hots and a cot, another words their three meals per day and a mattress on the floor to sleep on, a 25 watt bulb for light, a towel, a wash cloth, a bar of soap, and a roll of toilet paper.

That's it!

Of course, if their lives in the underground prison suck so bad, then there is another way out for them.

Image

Image

And every household should have one of these spray cans.

Image

This is an UZI, made in Israel!

This one is Kosher.

Re: Yet another reason to avoid little league

Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:56 am
by Earl
I couldn't have said it better.

Re: Yet another reason to avoid little league

Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:53 pm
by Fat Man
Earl wrote:I couldn't have said it better.
Thank you! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

Re: Yet another reason to avoid little league

Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 8:00 am
by irishhighlander
This reminds me of the hockey coach who abused boys in the 1970's~90's at Maple Leaf Gardens.
So much for machoman, more like sick freaks

work from home jobs

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2011 2:07 pm
by gregSMITHZ
Edit: My dear gregSMITHZ, as a moderator of this forum whose username is Earl, I have just deleted your entire message because you undoubtedly are a ...

Image





:evil:

Re: Yet another reason to avoid little league

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2011 5:03 pm
by i_like_1981
Erm... I do believe that the guy who posted above me may be a spammer. Huge block of text with no particular relevance to the topic? Very suspicious indeed.

Best regards,
i_like_1981

Re: Yet another reason to avoid little league

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 3:25 am
by ChrisOH
i_like_1981 wrote:Erm... I do believe that the guy who posted above me may be a spammer. Huge block of text with no particular relevance to the topic? Very suspicious indeed.
But boy, he sure knew how to butter us up, no? :lol:

Re: Yet another reason to avoid little league

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 3:53 am
by Earl
ChrisOH and i_like_1981, be sure to scroll back up to the post that was submitted by one gregSMITHZ, whose odious presence escaped my attention. I chose to *ahem* edit his post. Please check it out. You might find the current revision to be a much decided improvement.

Earl

Re: Yet another reason to avoid little league

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 4:27 am
by ChrisOH
Earl wrote:ChrisOH and i_like_1981, be sure to scroll back up to the post that was submitted by one gregSMITHZ, whose odious presence escaped my attention. I chose to *ahem* edit his post. Please check it out. You might find the current revision to be a much decided improvement.
Earl, you're turning into a maniac now that you found out how to post images! :lol:

Re: Yet another reason to avoid little league

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 4:44 am
by Earl
Hey, just wait until we get another troll. (Hint: I've done Google image searches on "troll," "obvious troll," and "dumbbell." Not to mention a few other choice pics that I got from firefly at A2K.) I'm looking forward to it. I'll be well-armed and prepared. :lol:

Re: Yet another reason to avoid little league

Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:00 pm
by i_like_1981
ChrisOH wrote:
i_like_1981 wrote:Erm... I do believe that the guy who posted above me may be a spammer. Huge block of text with no particular relevance to the topic? Very suspicious indeed.
But boy, he sure knew how to butter us up, no? :lol:
Well, if a spammer truly wants to butter me up and make me like them, the best way to do so would be to just not post anything at all. And preferably delete their account and trash their computer while they're at it. :D

Best regards,
i_like_1981