R.I.P. Daily and Sunday Sport

Welcome, Mates! Post here for General Discussions on how thoroughly sports suck. In general.
Post Reply
User avatar
Lewis
Member
Posts: 607
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:16 pm
Gender: Male
Location: UK

R.I.P. Daily and Sunday Sport

Post by Lewis »

The Daily and Sunday Sport, those diligent exponents of tabloid journalism's lower reaches, have folded. Their remains, it can be sensationally revealed with the aid of Photoshop, are located on the far side of the moon.

Having for nearly 20 and 25 years respectively offered a blend of punning headlines, celebrity gossip, soft pornography and, when all else failed, entirely made-up stories, the titles have gone belly, and much else besides, up.

It is an uncharacteristically low-key passing for two newspapers whose content made the Sun's regular Page Three feature look like Mary Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.

Building sites, men's locker rooms, boys' public school dormitories and other such all-male environments may mourn their passing. Feminists and those who prefer their news headlines unaccompanied by depictions of the female anatomy may not.

A paparazzo skulking outside a nightclub frequented by minor celebrities in search of an "up-skirt" shot. Such was the Sport's greatest contribution to the craft of Martha Gellhorn, Robert Capa and Sir Harold Evans.

The Sunday Sport was launched by West Ham co-owner David Sullivan in 1986, and its Daily stablemate followed five years later.

Under the editorship of Tony Livesey, both titles specialised in a rarified brand of yellow journalism and headlines such as "World War II Bomber Found on Moon".

Mr Livesey said his lasting legacy would be a Channel 4 Cutting Edge documentary about the Sport which showed him rigorously fact-checking a story headlined: "Aliens Turned Our Son Into A Fish Finger."

A market for such content was, clearly, out there. At its peak in 2005, the Daily Sport's circulation stood at 189,473, while the Sunday edition reached a high in the same year of 167,473.

But friends of the Sport titles may have predicted their demise when the internet made the necessity of shame-facedly visiting the newsagent a thing of the past for consumers of pornography.

After Mr Sullivan sold up, the Sport was relaunched in April 2008. Additionally, former Liberal Democrat MP Lembit Opik was recruited to lend some of his much-respected gravitas by writing a weekly political column.

But the launch of lads mags such as Zoo and Nuts meant extra competition and owner Sport Media Group's financial figures remained an inverse reflection of those of its female models.

No flowers.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-12958143

I am not sad to see it fold, anything that makes the Sun and the Mirror look like quality journalism should be wiped off the face of the earth. That said, I will miss the absurd front pages.

Image

Image

WTF were they even thinking when they came out with this?
Image
User avatar
Safety
Sportsman
Posts: 203
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:04 pm
Gender: M
Location: Ohio, US

Re: R.I.P. Daily and Sunday Sport

Post by Safety »

I'm a fan of the Onion myself.
"I hold that the parentheses are by far the most important parts of a non-business letter." - D. H. Lawrence
User avatar
Agent 47
Member
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:55 pm
Location: Australia

Re: R.I.P. Daily and Sunday Sport

Post by Agent 47 »

Lewis wrote: WTF were they even thinking when they came out with this?
Was there any actual sports content in those publications? Perhaps having all those completely ridiculous articles in there was to relieve the boredom of the sports articles? :wink:
"We can’t find a healthy brain in an ex-football player."

http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/2873539.htm
User avatar
i_like_1981
Member
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:11 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: R.I.P. Daily and Sunday Sport

Post by i_like_1981 »

I never particularly liked the Daily Sport. I mean, the Middle East protests have been all over the news these last few months and were on the front covers of near enough all national newspapers I saw in the shops EXCEPT for the Daily Sport, whose front pages only ever tended to feature some sex-related headline as their big selling point. Frankly it was more of a porn magazine than a proper newspaper, from what I've heard about it. I'm not interested to hear about which celebrity is rumping which other celebrity, I want to hear REAL NEWS!!!! By the way, Agent 47, I don't think it focused on sports that much at all. I think it was... a different kind of sport, shall we say, that held more interest for that newspaper!

Sorry, Daily Sport, but even the Sun and the Daily Star stayed relevant and had some merits as journalism, yet you couldn't even pull that off. You failed to do just about everything a newspaper should do.

Best regards,
i_like_1981
Image

Bernie Rhodes knows don't argue.
User avatar
Lewis
Member
Posts: 607
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:16 pm
Gender: Male
Location: UK

Re: R.I.P. Daily and Sunday Sport

Post by Lewis »

And like the Terminator when we all think it is dead, it is not.
Sunday Sport set to return as David Sullivan closes in on deal

Newspaper expected to return to newsstands on 8 May, but there's no reprieve for its sister title, the Daily Sport

The Sunday Sport is expected to begin publishing again in early May, with the paper's founder, David Sullivan, on the verge of buying it from administrators for less than £1m.

A contract for the Sunday Sport deal â?? but not for its sister title, the Daily Sport â?? is understood to have been issued although Sullivan, the co-owner of West Ham, has not yet signed it. One source familiar with the deal said it is "highly likely" to go through.

The Sunday Sport is expected to return to newsstands on 8 May, just over a month after its previous owner, Sport Media Group, ceased publication of the paper and its daily counterpart.

SMG ceased trading and put the papers up for sale on 1 April, after admitting that an "insufficient recovery" since poor sales during the inclement weather at the end of last year left it cash-strapped and "uncertain of support" from its bank.

Following unsuccessful talks with Royal Bank of Scotland, the company appointed BDO as administrator for the business. One of BDO's first moves was to make the papers' 80 employees redundant.

A BDO spokeswoman said: "Negotiations are ongoing. We are not in a position to announce a sale or confirm a sale."

Sullivan launched the Sunday Sport in 1986 and its daily sister title five years later. He sold his 50% stake in the business in December 2007, a deal that valued the Sport papers at about £40m.

But in 2009 Sullivan saved the business by loaning it £1.68m in return for a 9.9% stake.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/ap ... CMP=twt_fd

I noticed that on its front page today, it was affirming that Osama Bin Laden was killed, whilst he was using his toilet. Where on earth would we be without this quality journalism?
Image
User avatar
Fat Man
The Fat Man Judgeth
Posts: 3301
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:08 am
Gender: Male
Location: El Paso, Texas, USA, 3rd Planet, Sol System, Milky Way, Local Cluster, Somewhere in The Cosmos!
Contact:

Re: R.I.P. Daily and Sunday Sport

Post by Fat Man »

Lewis wrote:And like the Terminator when we all think it is dead, it is not.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/ap ... CMP=twt_fd

I noticed that on its front page today, it was affirming that Osama Bin Laden was killed, whilst he was using his toilet. Where on earth would we be without this quality journalism?
Gee! I thought Osama Trash-Bin Laden was shot while having sex with a goat!
ImageI'm fat and sassy! I love to sing & dance & stomp my feet & really rock your world!

All I want to hear from an ex-jock is "Will that be paper or plastic?" After that he can shut the fuck up!
Heah comes da judge! Heah comes da judge! Order in da court 'cuz heah comes da judge!
Image

Image
User avatar
i_like_1981
Member
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:11 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: R.I.P. Daily and Sunday Sport

Post by i_like_1981 »

Lewis wrote:And like the Terminator when we all think it is dead, it is not.

I noticed that on its front page today, it was affirming that Osama Bin Laden was killed, whilst he was using his toilet. Where on earth would we be without this quality journalism?
Great, here we go again. First it was Encyclopedia Dramatica that went down before suddenly returning and now it's this sad excuse for a newspaper. Why can't all this stupid shit just stay down and let the world become a more intelligent place?

Best regards,
i_like_1981
Image

Bernie Rhodes knows don't argue.
User avatar
Fat Man
The Fat Man Judgeth
Posts: 3301
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:08 am
Gender: Male
Location: El Paso, Texas, USA, 3rd Planet, Sol System, Milky Way, Local Cluster, Somewhere in The Cosmos!
Contact:

Re: R.I.P. Daily and Sunday Sport

Post by Fat Man »

i_like_1981 wrote:
Lewis wrote:And like the Terminator when we all think it is dead, it is not.

I noticed that on its front page today, it was affirming that Osama Bin Laden was killed, whilst he was using his toilet. Where on earth would we be without this quality journalism?
Great, here we go again. First it was Encyclopedia Dramatica that went down before suddenly returning and now it's this sad excuse for a newspaper. Why can't all this stupid shit just stay down and let the world become a more intelligent place?
Because most people who are stupid enough to read these crappy fish wrappers and believe everything in them, shit like, I SAW ELVIS IN A UFO, or some other shit like, A SPACE ALIEN ATE MY LAUNDRY, they are absolute morons, and morons will believe and buy anything.

And as long as there are morons who will buy any kind of stupid shit, there will always be people who are contented to make a shit load of money by selling stupid shit to morons who eagerly buy it up.

That's why we have sports, because morons will spend all their money on sports crap while their families go hungry, and there are people getting rich selling sports crap to morons.

Now, if everybody was more intelligent, there wouldn't be any morons buying worthless shit from the shit merchants, and they would go out of business.

That's why, the big sports organizations, and the Republicans, and big time television evangelist all got together, and plotted and engineered the decline in the quality of education in American schools, so that we now see high school graduates who can't read beyond the 4th grade level, and being poorly educated, they'll be stupid enough to buy any kind of worthless shit.

If everybody in the USA were better educated, and everyone more intelligent, too intelligent to buy into worthless crap and lies, then the big sports organizations, the Republican party, and the television evangelists would all go out of business and end up selling apples on a street corner or flying a cardboard sign.

Stupidity sells because stupidity is good for business.
ImageI'm fat and sassy! I love to sing & dance & stomp my feet & really rock your world!

All I want to hear from an ex-jock is "Will that be paper or plastic?" After that he can shut the fuck up!
Heah comes da judge! Heah comes da judge! Order in da court 'cuz heah comes da judge!
Image

Image
User avatar
i_like_1981
Member
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:11 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: R.I.P. Daily and Sunday Sport

Post by i_like_1981 »

Fat Man wrote:Because most people who are stupid enough to read these crappy fish wrappers and believe everything in them, shit like, I SAW ELVIS IN A UFO, or some other shit like, A SPACE ALIEN ATE MY LAUNDRY, they are absolute morons, and morons will believe and buy anything.

And as long as there are morons who will buy any kind of stupid shit, there will always be people who are contented to make a shit load of money...
I hear you there. It's like these dumbass sports fans who buy the FIFA video games every year who don't realise that the game is EXACTLY THE SAME but with the year number having gone up by one. Maybe a few new players as well, but that's it. Same game, same premise, same thing, but £40 every year. I don't know what drives them. As long as idiots exist in this world, there are going to be clever businessmen out there who want to capitalise on their foolishness. I can't say I blame them, really.

Best regards,
i_like_1981
Image

Bernie Rhodes knows don't argue.
daves336
Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 2:48 pm

Re: R.I.P. Daily and Sunday Sport

Post by daves336 »

I hear you there. It's like these dumbass sports fans who buy the FIFA video games every year who don't realise that the game is EXACTLY THE SAME but with the year number having gone up by one. Maybe a few new players as well, but that's it. Same game, same premise, same thing, but £40 every year. I don't know what drives them. As long as idiots exist in this world, there are going to be clever businessmen out there who want to capitalise on their foolishness. I can't say I blame them, really.
I disagree there.

The similarities in annual games apply to ALL games, not just sports game. Take Call of Duty, different story mode, but same online features and arcade features with few features added.

And it's not exactly the same. While obviously it's pretty similar, the squad's are updated, the game graphics are refined (same as ALL other games, not sports games), new game modes are added, and the existing game modes are changed. Not to mention the change in gameplay. Yes, it's the same idea, but they know that and it's their money. They pay the £40 to get the updated, more realistic feel.

Again, it's not sports fan, it's ALL annual games that are similar. And, FIFA isn't just played by sports fans; I know of A LOT of people that buy it because it's the most popular sports game around.
User avatar
i_like_1981
Member
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:11 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: R.I.P. Daily and Sunday Sport

Post by i_like_1981 »

Well, welcome to the forum. Good to see a new member round here at last who ISN'T a spammer. Really, it's quite a novelty on this forum.

The thing with Call of Duty games, though, is that the changes are more evident with every new game they bring out. Whereas the games used to be set in the WW2 battlefields, now they have gone for modern warfare settings like the Middle-East warzones. You notice the differences with each new COD game more than you would with a FIFA game. The missions of the COD games change, as do the weapons, settings, time periods, all that bollocks. Whereas with each FIFA release, you know that it's just going to involve controlling men running round a field for a set period of time. That is a constant in that particular series. And surely the graphics can't get much more realistic now? I bet most people who buy the FIFA games hardly notice it's exactly the same game year after year, but only buy it so that they seem "up-to-date" with the sporting world. The differences between individual COD games stand out a lot more than the differences between the FIFA games.

Perhaps my argument won't work when virtual reality becomes commercially available. That's the only time you'll ever see a revolutionary change in sports video games, when the buyers actually get into the games themselves. Until then, I'll just view all the new FIFA releases as being effectively the same game released year after year, with a few new players and a slightly higher price tag to allow for inflation. :D

(For your information, I don't even play COD. All I'm saying is that you'd probably notice more difference between releases of those games than you would with a FIFA game. But you're right to some extent - all sequels are is a slightly different continuation of the original thing.)

Best regards,
i_like_1981
Image

Bernie Rhodes knows don't argue.
daves336
Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 2:48 pm

Re: R.I.P. Daily and Sunday Sport

Post by daves336 »

Well, welcome to the forum. Good to see a new member round here at last who ISN'T a spammer. Really, it's quite a novelty on this forum.

The thing with Call of Duty games, though, is that the changes are more evident with every new game they bring out. Whereas the games used to be set in the WW2 battlefields, now they have gone for modern warfare settings like the Middle-East warzones. You notice the differences with each new COD game more than you would with a FIFA game. The missions of the COD games change, as do the weapons, settings, time periods, all that bollocks. Whereas with each FIFA release, you know that it's just going to involve controlling men running round a field for a set period of time. That is a constant in that particular series. And surely the graphics can't get much more realistic now? I bet most people who buy the FIFA games hardly notice it's exactly the same game year after year, but only buy it so that they seem "up-to-date" with the sporting world. The differences between individual COD games stand out a lot more than the differences between the FIFA games.

Perhaps my argument won't work when virtual reality becomes commercially available. That's the only time you'll ever see a revolutionary change in sports video games, when the buyers actually get into the games themselves. Until then, I'll just view all the new FIFA releases as being effectively the same game released year after year, with a few new players and a slightly higher price tag to allow for inflation.

(For your information, I don't even play COD. All I'm saying is that you'd probably notice more difference between releases of those games than you would with a FIFA game. But you're right to some extent - all sequels are is a slightly different continuation of the original thing.)
Well, yes COD have map changes, but Its very similar.

I wasn't just using cod as an example, ANY game series that has a yearly release is much the same. As I have played (not a game fan anymore) FIFA's and COD's; the both add the same amount of features - COD is men running around shooting each other and FIFA is men running around playing football.

Personally, I played FIFA for the manager mode. You can organise a team ect and it really is a great mode ; from fifa 2006 to fifa 2010, it became more realistic and intruiging each time.

With COD - apart from a few shorts levels added, it was the same thing online - a different time period, but come on, its the same. Plus, FIFA has legends mode, be ONE player mode and god knows what else they added to FIFA 11
Post Reply