I'm fat and sassy! I love to sing & dance & stomp my feet & really rock your world!
Um, maybe that they promoted science and learning, and a willingness to think for themselves, instead of following what was popular at the time?Safety wrote:What's so important about Charles Darwin and Galileo?
Aren't unsupported assertions just *so* cute?Safety wrote: They were both wrong and are now burning in Hell.
There was a time last year, Safety, when I suspected you might have been some 4channer who came in some time after the original raids to work up some bad attention on this forum. I've let this drop for the last few months, but I'm starting to become suspicious again and until you back up your assertions in this quote with some solid information as to why you think this, I'm going to have to bring that suspicion back.Safety wrote:What's so important about Charles Darwin and Galileo? They were both wrong and are now burning in Hell.
I agree, that statement has troll written all over it. I remember many of his posts contained what could be seen as 4chan references, but I thought he might have adapted these 4chan memes from somewhere else, as I've heard several memes outside of 4chan despite the fact that they originated in 4chan. But that statement seems quite a lot like a post intended to cause controversy here.i_like_1981 wrote:There was a time last year, Safety, when I suspected you might have been some 4channer who came in some time after the original raids to work up some bad attention on this forum. I've let this drop for the last few months, but I'm starting to become suspicious again and until you back up your assertions in this quote with some solid information as to why you think this, I'm going to have to bring that suspicion back.Safety wrote:What's so important about Charles Darwin and Galileo? They were both wrong and are now burning in Hell.
Oh! This is good! Yeah! I really love this!Safety wrote:What's so important about Charles Darwin and Galileo? They were both wrong and are now burning in Hell.
Yeah! You remember saying that, in another topic???Safety wrote:God gives me hope and helps me when I'm not feeling so well. He inspires me to be a better person. Why are you so against him?
Yeah! This is going to end real good!Skul wrote:Oh... this is gonna end well...
You trolling?
I'm fat and sassy! I love to sing & dance & stomp my feet & really rock your world!
"Try reading Genesis."i_like_1981 wrote:until you back up your assertions in this quote with some solid information as to why you think this...Safety wrote:What's so important about Charles Darwin and Galileo? They were both wrong and are now burning in Hell.
Happy Anniversary, dude!Fat Man wrote:Incidentally, it was back on Thursday, February 12, 2009 when I joined our anti-sports forum, which was Charles Darwin's 200th birthday.
Thank you very much RF.recovering_fan wrote:Happy Anniversary, dude!Fat Man wrote:Incidentally, it was back on Thursday, February 12, 2009 when I joined our anti-sports forum, which was Charles Darwin's 200th birthday.
I'm fat and sassy! I love to sing & dance & stomp my feet & really rock your world!Actually, both Darwin and Galileo were of Christian backgrounds. Darwin was a believer in the literal truth of the Bible even up to the time he set out on his famous voyage on the Beagle. Afterwards, he couldn't reconcile a belief in an all-powerful, all-loving god with what he saw in nature (i.e. some organisms had to die so that others might live) and he considered himself an agnostic the remainder of his life, although his wife attended church and he maintained good relations with some church officials.recovering_fan wrote:
It's a real shame, because once upon a time, Christian theologians actually cared about making their world view and their beliefs square with naturalistic philosophy. One of the finest examples of this was Thomas Aquinas, who tried to reconcile the Christian faith with Aristotle from what I've heard. However, I don't know many of the details surrounding that, as I've never paid much attention to religion or philosophy.
I think that Safety should get the SPAMMER rank for now. He's not completely obnoxious or stupid (I'm thinking outside this thread here, in general) but he is rather provocative and ambiguous. He should get the SPAMMER rank, and only be able to lose it if he can improve the content and quality of his posts. I'll be keeping an eye on this thread to see any new developments.Fat Man wrote:I believe that the board moderators should change his forum rank from Sportsman to Sports Bore and give him the Jersey Of Shame!
Wow, I didn't know that word was used outside of Britain. You don't hear words like "douche bag" or "jackass" used over here. English swear words are now a global trademark, it seems.You're such a drooling wet pants little twat...
I completely understand. You have a right to be mad. There was really no need for that comment, and I'm sure Safety knew damn well the consequences of what he was doing. I wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't post here again for a few more weeks, if at all.I wanted to celebrate the birthday of Charles Darwin today, but now I'm in a bad mood!
Given what you were posting on the Picture Association thread this morning, I wouldn't say this card would harm you too much.or the Commie card...
Okay, i_like_1981, but you should know that the acceptability of "creation science" is an increasingly common delusion within the United States, so Safety isn't necessarily trying to sound ignorant. Don't blame the scholar; blame the schools.i_like_1981 wrote: I think that Safety should get the SPAMMER rank for now. He's not completely obnoxious or stupid (I'm thinking outside this thread here, in general) but he is rather provocative and ambiguous.
Well, he is entitled to believe what he wants to believe, and he can express that in this forum if he wishes. I have no problem if he wants to defend sports on here, but when he comes shooting onto a thread and decries the subjects of another user's admiration in such a blunt, unjustified way, it borders on trolling, you know. I wouldn't go onto a thread started by another person and put down their beliefs without trying to explain myself and Safety shouldn't have done that either.recovering_fan wrote:Okay, i_like_1981, but you should know that the acceptability of "creation science" is an increasingly common delusion within the United States, so Safety isn't necessarily trying to sound ignorant...
