MOST OF THE STEREO-TYPES ARE TRUE!!!

Welcome, Mates! Post here for General Discussions on how thoroughly sports suck. In general.
Post Reply
User avatar
Fat Man
The Fat Man Judgeth
Posts: 3301
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:08 am
Gender: Male
Location: El Paso, Texas, USA, 3rd Planet, Sol System, Milky Way, Local Cluster, Somewhere in The Cosmos!
Contact:

MOST OF THE STEREO-TYPES ARE TRUE!!!

Post by Fat Man »

One of my favorite TV programs on Spike TV is MANSWERS which gets rather explicate most of the time, but it gives truthful answers to many questions.

In the past I have stereo-typed rednecks or uneducated people as having sex with barnyard animals.

Well, it turns out to be true!

About 40% percent of rural teenagers have had sex with animals! That's right, 40% percent!

So, the stereo-type of rednecks having sex with barnyard animals turns out to be accurate after all.

I always thought that it was just a big joke, but no, it's not a joke. It's true!

That is disgusting!

Therefore all the other stereo-types of jocks and sports fans must also be true.

I would say, that at least half, or perhaps more than half, of all sports fans are rude obnoxious bores who beat up on their wives and kids when their favorite team loses the big game of the season.

Also, more then half of all professional football players are rapists!

About 20% percent, that is one fifth of all Americans believe that the sun revolves around the earth.

I would say that about half of the human race does not deserve to live, and that the mindless herd needs thinning out.

I mean, really!!! When we have at least 40% percent of rural teens having sex with animals!

I'm sorry, but I have to say this.

Some people need killing!

Of course, I'm not going to do it. I'll leave that up to professionals who know what needs to be done.

Oh, by the way, it has nothing to do with race, or socioeconomic class either. There are a lot of rich people who are morons and a lot of whites who are low class redneck scum.

We don't need anymore ignorant morons contaminating the human gene pool.
ImageI'm fat and sassy! I love to sing & dance & stomp my feet & really rock your world!

All I want to hear from an ex-jock is "Will that be paper or plastic?" After that he can shut the fuck up!
Heah comes da judge! Heah comes da judge! Order in da court 'cuz heah comes da judge!
Image

Image
Earl
Member
Posts: 2498
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:36 pm
Gender: Male
Location: somewhere in Texas, Oklahoma, or Louisiana

Re: MOST OF THE STEREO-TYPES ARE TRUE!!!

Post by Earl »

Fat Man, you are free to express your opinions. Since we are friends, I know that you will not take the following comments personally.
Fat Man wrote:One of my favorite TV programs on Spike TV is MANSWERS which gets rather explicate most of the time, but it gives truthful answers to many questions.

In the past I have stereo-typed rednecks or uneducated people as having sex with barnyard animals.

Well, it turns out to be true!

About 40% percent of rural teenagers have had sex with animals! That's right, 40% percent!
MANSWERS is not exactly a promoter of high moral standards; so, I question their objectivity. I'd like to see statistical proof of this outrageous claim. I cannot believe that beastiality is this widespread. If this sexual perversion is as widespread as they claim, then we as a nation are doomed.
Fat Man wrote:I would say, that at least half, or perhaps more than half, of all sports fans are rude obnoxious bores who beat up on their wives and kids when their favorite team loses the big game of the season.

Also, more then half of all professional football players are rapists!
I cannot believe that "at least half" of sports fans beat up on their wives and children when their teams lose. I'm not saying there aren't any who do. I also don't believe that "more than half" of professional football players are rapists. I do believe, though, that there are a few who have committed rape. For all I know, reliable statistics may be hard to come by, since rapes frequently are not even reported.
Fat Man wrote:Some people need killing!
This is what Hitler and Stalin said.
Fat Man wrote:Of course, I'm not going to do it. I'll leave that up to professionals who know what needs to be done.
But the United States does not have a secret police. Fat Man, I know that you really don't mean what you're saying. I know that you're really a nice guy who doesn't have a violent bone in his body. You're just letting off steam.
Fat Man wrote:We don't need anymore ignorant morons contaminating the human gene pool.
There is no correlation between genes (or intelligence) and morality.

Remember, Fat Man, we're friends; and I'm just an intrusive moderator. :wink:
"Some cause happiness wherever they go; others, whenever they go." -- Oscar Wilde

Go, Montana State Bobcats!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRq4_uxM ... re=related
User avatar
Fat Man
The Fat Man Judgeth
Posts: 3301
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:08 am
Gender: Male
Location: El Paso, Texas, USA, 3rd Planet, Sol System, Milky Way, Local Cluster, Somewhere in The Cosmos!
Contact:

Re: MOST OF THE STEREO-TYPES ARE TRUE!!!

Post by Fat Man »

Earl wrote:Fat Man, you are free to express your opinions. Since we are friends, I know that you will not take the following comments personally.
Fat Man wrote:One of my favorite TV programs on Spike TV is MANSWERS which gets rather explicate most of the time, but it gives truthful answers to many questions.

In the past I have stereo-typed rednecks or uneducated people as having sex with barnyard animals.

Well, it turns out to be true!

About 40% percent of rural teenagers have had sex with animals! That's right, 40% percent!
MANSWERS is not exactly a promoter of high moral standards; so, I question their objectivity. I'd like to see statistical proof of this outrageous claim. I cannot believe that beastiality is this widespread. If this sexual perversion is as widespread as they claim, then we as a nation are doomed.
Fat Man wrote:I would say, that at least half, or perhaps more than half, of all sports fans are rude obnoxious bores who beat up on their wives and kids when their favorite team loses the big game of the season.

Also, more then half of all professional football players are rapists!
I cannot believe that "at least half" of sports fans beat up on their wives and children when their teams lose. I'm not saying there aren't any. I also don't believe that "more than half" of professional football players are rapists. I do believe, though, that there are a few who have committed rape. How many is hard to determine since rape is an underreported crime.
Fat Man wrote:Some people need killing!
This is what Hitler and Stalin said.
Fat Man wrote:Of course, I'm not going to do it. I'll leave that up to professionals who know what needs to be done.
But the United States does not have a secret police. Fat Man, I know that you really don't mean what you're saying. I know that you're really a nice guy who doesn't have a violent bone in his body.
Fat Man wrote:We don't need anymore ignorant morons contaminating the human gene pool.
There is no correlation between genes (or intelligence) and morality.
Hello Earl

OK, I came across this Wikipedia article on Zoophilia concerning the percentages of people having sex with animals.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia
Extent of occurrence

The Kinsey reports controversially rated the percentage of people who had sexual interaction with animals at some point in their lives as 8% for men and 3.6% for women, and claimed it was 40â??50 percent in people living near farms, but some later writers dispute the figures, because the study lacked a random sample, and because the prison population was included, causing sampling bias. Martin Duberman has written that it is difficult to get a random sample in sexual research, and that even when Paul Gebhard, Kinsey's research successor, removed prison samples from the figures, he found the figures were not significantly changed.

By 1974, the farm population in the USA had declined by 80 percent compared to 1940, reducing the opportunity to live with animals; Hunt's 1974 study suggests that the demographic changes led to a significant change in reported occurrence. Males in 1974 were 4.9% (1948: 8.3%), and in females in 1974 were 1.9% (1953: 3.6%). Miletski believes this is not a reduction in interest but a reduction in opportunity.

Nancy Friday's 1973 book on female sexuality, My Secret Garden, comprised around 190 fantasies from different women; of these, 23 involve zoosexual activity.

In one study, psychiatric patients were found to have a statistically-significant higher prevalence rate (55 percent) of reported bestiality, both actual sexual contacts (45 percent) and sexual fantasy (30 percent) than the control groups of medical in-patients (10 percent) and psychiatric staff (15 percent). Crépault and Couture (1980) reported that 5.3 percent of the men they surveyed have fantasized about sexual activity with an animal during heterosexual intercourse. A 1982 study suggested that 7.5 percent of 186 university students had interacted sexually with an animal.

Sexual fantasies about zoosexual acts can occur in people who do not wish to experience them in real life. Nancy Friday notes that zoophilia as a fantasy may provide an escape from cultural expectations, restrictions, and judgements in regard to sex. A frequency interest in and sexual excitement at watching animals mate is cited as an indicator of latent zoophilia by Massen (1994). Masters (1962) says brothel madames used to stage exhibitions of animals mating, as they found it aroused their clientele, and that it can encourage their clients to engage in bestiality.

Several studies have found that women show stronger vaginal responses to films depicting bonobo copulation than to non-sexual stimuli.
Yes, I know there is no absolute correlation between genes and intelligence or morality.

But values do get passed down from parents to their children.

Also, the bullying that goes on in our schools, I blame mostly on the parents who have failed to teach their children any moral values.

So, I believe that when kids get bullied around in our schools, the parents of the bullies should be charged for their crimes and made to pay some really heavy fines. Hit them in the pocket book!

Maybe that will give these parents some incentive to teach their children not to be bullies.

Also, in the past, you have agreed with me the pedophiles who molest and rape children deserve the death penalty. I also believe that rapists should get the death penalty as well.

What really gets me angry is that the intellectuals in our country are powerless to do anything about the declining quality of education in our schools or stop the increasing ignorance and incidents of brutality.

I'm sorry, but I'm very angry right now.

Here in El Paso, we once had a recreational park where people could go swimming, boating, and fishing, but the park has been closed down because some morons got drunk, and went out in a boat and drowned, so they closed the park.

This is wrong. We are losing our freedom in order to protect morons. This is not natural.

We need to keep our basic rights and our freedom and just simply let the morons die through their own stupidity. Another words, let nature thin down the herd, and then, with fewer morons getting in the way, it will make it easier for us to live our own lives. Fewer morons mean fewer bullies in our schools, and fewer moronic parents who fail to teach their children any moral values.

That would be better than trying to kill them off. Just give us back our freedom and stop protecting morons by taking away our freedom, and let nature thin down the herd of morons.

Yeah, I guess that I was just letting off some steam.

I'm afraid that as a nation, we are doomed.
ImageI'm fat and sassy! I love to sing & dance & stomp my feet & really rock your world!

All I want to hear from an ex-jock is "Will that be paper or plastic?" After that he can shut the fuck up!
Heah comes da judge! Heah comes da judge! Order in da court 'cuz heah comes da judge!
Image

Image
User avatar
i_like_1981
Member
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:11 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: MOST OF THE STEREO-TYPES ARE TRUE!!!

Post by i_like_1981 »

The way I see it, every stereotype has to have a grain of truth in it somewhere. Not saying that all people in a certain group conform to it but there have to be a select number who are responsible for it coming about. And we know that some sports fans can be very rowdy, hateful and intolerant indeed. (Do I really have to name you a famous example on our own boards again?)
Sports-related crimes are common and well-documented. Take the Heysel tragedy in 1985 and the Hillsborough disaster four years later. Things like this have led to people stereotyping the British soccer fans as disorderly and thuggish and I know this has a grain of truth in it. People aren't just saying it for the sole purpose of demeaning the group without any solid reason, they actually know that the stereotype is partly true. I won't say anything that could be taken as racist. Soccer fans aren't really a race in my book. They're just a group, and not a very cultured or caring one. But for a stereotype to come about, there has to be something that starts it.
Not all the stereotypes are completely true, but they must have come about for a reason. A significant number of people from said group must all have partaken in a certain activity of any sort to be stereotyped for it. It's not always something bad - for example, the British are stereotyped as always drinking tea. Which they do a lot, and I do.
So stereotypes have to be true to some extent. They can't just be all wrong. Otherwise how would they even exist?

Best regards,
i_like_1981
Image

Bernie Rhodes knows don't argue.
Post Reply