I discovered this website in late December of 2008 and actually began posting in the following spring. Reading through all the letters posted in the â??Lettersâ? columns (as well as some of the posts in the forum), I was appalled by all the hatred from those sports fans who had actually bothered to leave messages. What finally provided the spark for me to start posting at this website was provided by a hateful message provided by a certain â??Haroldâ? in the â??Letters 2009â? column.
(This Harold, incidentally, turned out to be a complete fraud, as he revealed his true identity at Andy Austinâ??s website thegridirionpalace.com. He had portrayed himself as an American high-school football player, which was a complete lie. Heâ??s not even American. And after seeing a picture of him, I can also say with certainty that I look more macho than he does. I probably also have a more manly chest than he does, and to think that I'm 60 years old!) But I digress â?¦
I felt impelled to defend this website from all the haters who apparently believe that the sports culture is totally above critical review and that those who disagree with even certain aspects of the sports culture should be silenced -- because, after all, sports are sacred (especially the popular ones).

To answer my own question, let me say that Iâ??ve appreciated learning about other men who have no interest in sports, but are physically active -- including physical fitness enthusiasts, bodybuilders, and even former athletes. (To see what I mean, check out the Letters especially.) Indeed, nonathletic men who have no interest in sports are just as diverse as any other group of people.
Finally, in this OP of mine, let me say that Iâ??ve appreciated this forum for providing me the opportunity to be able to make a critique of the â??sports onlyâ? mandatory P.E. that still is a reality in way too many school districts. (Of course, as far as I'm concerned, one school district with the "old" P.E. is one district too many.) I remember reading a recent post of his in which Silence made the observation that nonathletic boys are humiliated in â??sports onlyâ? mandatory P.E. Not only is that true, but they hardly get any exercise. The very idea that these classes have been called â??physical educationâ? classes has been a big joke. Indeed, a monumental exercise in hypocrisy. How can genuine â??physical educationâ? take place without the realization that different students have different physical fitness needs? Letâ??s compare a slightly built teenage boy who wants to build up his physique with another boy who is overweight and wants to slim down. In terms of the sort of exercises that they need to do, are their physical fitness needs the same? Of course not! Our two hypothetical boys would be on two different exercise programs. Hence, the need for choice in such a class. So many people say that without sports, everyone would become fat. Baloney! A sport is a physical contest; it is not an exercise program. It may encourage some people to keep active as participants, but it's still not an exercise program. Those who want to play sports should be encouraged to do so, just so long as their form of recreation isn't imposed upon the unwilling (such as nonathletic students in the schools). (Of course, they should also not ignore the risks involved in certain sports; but that's for another thread.)
I digressed again and started ranting. No, I take that back. It wasnâ??t ranting at all; it was reasoned discourse.


